Well, I botched my Conference Championship picks, so I sit at 4-6 on the playoffs this year.
Sunday, February 5th, 2012
~6:30pm ET
Super Bowl XLVI
NY Giants (4-seed) vs. New England (1-seed)
Four years ago, I picked the Patriots to win it all and go 19-0. This year, I'm backing the Giants, for the reasons I learned in 2007.
The Patriots have been suspect to me all year - that they got this far is proof of a weak AFC playoff field, in my opinion. I feel that a healthy Texans team would have beaten both Baltimore and New England (and the NY Giants, for that matter). But this is what we've got. The Patriots lack of defense concerns me. To be fair, though, I had the same concern about the Colts the year they won it all. But I feel like they won't be able to keep up and expected someone to exploit that earlier - but they lucked out and got to face a lame Denver team and an offensively-inconsistent Ravens team. Neither of those teams were gelling like the Giants are right now.
As for the NY Giants, they've been the best team in football the last six weeks or so. The key to this game really is in their pass rush - if they can get in Brady's face and make him uncomfortable all game long, they'll win. It's as simple as that. The rest will fall into place. The Giants' pass rush has been great all playoffs long - often getting pressure with just a 4-man rush, allowing them to drop seven into coverage. If they can do that against the Patriots, I feel like they'll hold up. Pundits are remarking on the Giants overall defensive ranking (low, but not lower than the Patriots), but really, to gauge the Giants we're seeing right now, you have to ignore much of the early season and just look at recent games. They're on fire. They roll on.
The NYG pass rush is the key. If it works, they win. If not, they lose.
Showing posts with label NFL Playoffs 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NFL Playoffs 2011. Show all posts
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Pierce's Picks - NFL Conference Championship Weekend
I went 2-2 again, putting me at 4-4 so far for the playoffs.
I knew I should have picked the Giants last week - Green Bay felt too much like a Peyton Manning Classic Colts team that rested their starters on Week 17 and then would lose in the second round because everyone was rusty and out-of-sync. Like 'em or not, Belicheck and his Patriots have always had the right idea insofar as playing every down. Still not sure why their starters were on the field in the fourth quarter last week, though.
Amazing how far Houston pressed Baltimore, especially with T.J. Yates finally playing like a rookie - he wasn't awful, but he wasn't great, definitely not good enough for the playoffs that game. What promise that young guy shows, though. Hard to think the Texans keep him and Matt Leinart after this season. I feel like Houston was the team to win it all if they'd been healthy - they got this far with their 1st/2nd-string QBs down for the last few weeks and with Mario Williams out. This is the best team in the AFC, folks... they just caught some bad breaks this year. Watch out next season.
That San Francisco/New Orleans game was the most exciting of the year so far.
Sunday at 3:00pm ET -
Baltimore (2-seed) @ New England (1-seed)
This smells like the 49ers/Saints game. Given, the home-field advantage is reversed. But still. Who really expects Baltimore to win this one? Flacco had a so-so game and the offense looked out of sync last week. But they survived and that defense looks geared up. I feel like the tough Houston matchup has people doubting the Ravens whereas the soft Broncos matchup has people high on the Patriots. The Ravens are 7-0 against playoff teams this season; New England hasn't beaten a team with a winning record. I think Baltimore brings it when it counts. Even in this year of wacky offense, it's clear - defense wins championships.
Sunday at 6:30pm ET -
NY Giants (4-seed) @ San Francisco (2-seed)
And that brings us to this matchup, of what has been the two best defenses in the NFC in the latter part of the season. The Giants are riding a huge streak of playing quality football, for about five straight weeks now, basically since that ugly 23-10 loss to the Redskins. San Francisco, though, has been the most consistent team in the entire league, week-in and week-out. They come to play and that team just looks special this year. I like the Giants and they definitely have some of that Super Bowl XLII magic going for them this year - who isn't flashing back to that team as they watch the 2011 Giants in the playoffs? - but I feel like consistency is the key here. Alex Smith showed us his gusto last week and I feel like home-field advantage helps the 49ers here. That crowd is going to be stoked. I still can't quite put faith fully into the Giants - they pounded a Falcons team that was predictably hapless outdoors and a Green Bay team that doesn't play defense. The 49ers beat the Saints. The 49ers will beat the Giants.
Yes. I am predicting the SUPER HARBAUGH BOWL. Although a Super Bowl XLII rematch would be fun, but far less engrossing to me, to be honest. Seen it. It'd be fun, but, seen it. The only way that'd be fun is if we watched the Patriots lose a gut-wrencher again. I want to see the first Super Bowl between brothers.
In other news -
Peyton Manning can't remain a Colt. I'd be shocked if he does and I think it'd be a terrible move by the new GM if he did. New GM? Bring in the new coach, bring in a new QB. Learn from Green Bay and part ways with your veteran once you're rebuilding; learn from Detroit and bring in a new front office, new coach, and new QB all together. As for where Peyton goes? Tough call. I saw a write-up by one of the Grantland writers that basically said the 49ers were the most logical choice - they'd dominate the NFC for the rest of his career and could build the rest of the team in that time, while grooming a QB-of-the-future. That makes the most sense to me, but if the 49ers win the Super Bowl, why not stay with Alex Smith? He certainly proved himself against the Saints. I think if Baltimore flares out because Joe Flacco falters, that's a logical option, too. If you're a Ravens fan, you've gotta be holding your breath half the time the game rides on Flacco's shoulders, even if his statistics come out good. I have trouble seeing Peyton as a Jet - the very character of that team seems contrary to his personality; but besides that, it's also a logical fit. Plus he'd get to play Tom Brady twice a year for awhile yet. Beyond that, it's hard to find playoff-caliber teams with that gaping of a need at QB and it's hard to imagine Peyton going to a rebuilding team for his twilight years. If you go that route, Arizona makes sense and Ken Whisenhunt might like to have a veteran QB come in and save his job next year. Or who knows, Peyton might retire. No one really talks about that, but the guy's had three neck surgeries in two years and already has a Super Bowl ring. He might be content with what he's got. We'll see.
I knew I should have picked the Giants last week - Green Bay felt too much like a Peyton Manning Classic Colts team that rested their starters on Week 17 and then would lose in the second round because everyone was rusty and out-of-sync. Like 'em or not, Belicheck and his Patriots have always had the right idea insofar as playing every down. Still not sure why their starters were on the field in the fourth quarter last week, though.
Amazing how far Houston pressed Baltimore, especially with T.J. Yates finally playing like a rookie - he wasn't awful, but he wasn't great, definitely not good enough for the playoffs that game. What promise that young guy shows, though. Hard to think the Texans keep him and Matt Leinart after this season. I feel like Houston was the team to win it all if they'd been healthy - they got this far with their 1st/2nd-string QBs down for the last few weeks and with Mario Williams out. This is the best team in the AFC, folks... they just caught some bad breaks this year. Watch out next season.
That San Francisco/New Orleans game was the most exciting of the year so far.
Sunday at 3:00pm ET -
Baltimore (2-seed) @ New England (1-seed)
This smells like the 49ers/Saints game. Given, the home-field advantage is reversed. But still. Who really expects Baltimore to win this one? Flacco had a so-so game and the offense looked out of sync last week. But they survived and that defense looks geared up. I feel like the tough Houston matchup has people doubting the Ravens whereas the soft Broncos matchup has people high on the Patriots. The Ravens are 7-0 against playoff teams this season; New England hasn't beaten a team with a winning record. I think Baltimore brings it when it counts. Even in this year of wacky offense, it's clear - defense wins championships.
Sunday at 6:30pm ET -
NY Giants (4-seed) @ San Francisco (2-seed)
And that brings us to this matchup, of what has been the two best defenses in the NFC in the latter part of the season. The Giants are riding a huge streak of playing quality football, for about five straight weeks now, basically since that ugly 23-10 loss to the Redskins. San Francisco, though, has been the most consistent team in the entire league, week-in and week-out. They come to play and that team just looks special this year. I like the Giants and they definitely have some of that Super Bowl XLII magic going for them this year - who isn't flashing back to that team as they watch the 2011 Giants in the playoffs? - but I feel like consistency is the key here. Alex Smith showed us his gusto last week and I feel like home-field advantage helps the 49ers here. That crowd is going to be stoked. I still can't quite put faith fully into the Giants - they pounded a Falcons team that was predictably hapless outdoors and a Green Bay team that doesn't play defense. The 49ers beat the Saints. The 49ers will beat the Giants.
Yes. I am predicting the SUPER HARBAUGH BOWL. Although a Super Bowl XLII rematch would be fun, but far less engrossing to me, to be honest. Seen it. It'd be fun, but, seen it. The only way that'd be fun is if we watched the Patriots lose a gut-wrencher again. I want to see the first Super Bowl between brothers.
In other news -
Peyton Manning can't remain a Colt. I'd be shocked if he does and I think it'd be a terrible move by the new GM if he did. New GM? Bring in the new coach, bring in a new QB. Learn from Green Bay and part ways with your veteran once you're rebuilding; learn from Detroit and bring in a new front office, new coach, and new QB all together. As for where Peyton goes? Tough call. I saw a write-up by one of the Grantland writers that basically said the 49ers were the most logical choice - they'd dominate the NFC for the rest of his career and could build the rest of the team in that time, while grooming a QB-of-the-future. That makes the most sense to me, but if the 49ers win the Super Bowl, why not stay with Alex Smith? He certainly proved himself against the Saints. I think if Baltimore flares out because Joe Flacco falters, that's a logical option, too. If you're a Ravens fan, you've gotta be holding your breath half the time the game rides on Flacco's shoulders, even if his statistics come out good. I have trouble seeing Peyton as a Jet - the very character of that team seems contrary to his personality; but besides that, it's also a logical fit. Plus he'd get to play Tom Brady twice a year for awhile yet. Beyond that, it's hard to find playoff-caliber teams with that gaping of a need at QB and it's hard to imagine Peyton going to a rebuilding team for his twilight years. If you go that route, Arizona makes sense and Ken Whisenhunt might like to have a veteran QB come in and save his job next year. Or who knows, Peyton might retire. No one really talks about that, but the guy's had three neck surgeries in two years and already has a Super Bowl ring. He might be content with what he's got. We'll see.
Friday, January 13, 2012
Pierce's Picks - NFL Divisional Championship Weekend
I went 2-2 last week, missing on New Orleans and Denver.
You may notice as you look at this week's slate of games that last week, all four Wild Card teams were eliminated. Home teams went 4-0 last week. Will it happen again? History says the divisional round is the most lopsided in favor of the home team (check the stats, really).
Saturday at 4:30pm ET -
New Orleans (3-seed) @ San Francisco (2-seed)
I feel like New Orleans is the team to beat right now in the NFC. Say what you want about the Packers, but is any team playing offense as well as the Saints? The Packers might be the most dynamic offense, but the Saints are becoming the most efficient. Shut down the run and they'll smoke you through the air. Take away their deep routes and they'll gash you short and with the run. They look indomitable. But the common maxim has always been that defense wins championships. That theory is put to the test in this game - the better offense or the better defense? I'm taking the Saints' offense, and a defense that's just good enough.
Saturday at 8:00pm ET -
Denver (4-seed) @ New England (1-seed)
Tim vs. Tom. Denver's win last week was improbable and came against a battered Pittsburgh defense - make no mistake; Ike Taylor is not a great CB and the Steelers were playing all backups on their D-line. However, Pittsburgh's second-string defense is probably better than New England's first-string. But the Patriots offense, if it gets going, can shred Denver's defense. The onus of this game really falls on Denver's defense: can they make Brady uncomfortable and knock him off his rhythm? If yes, they have a chance. If not, then they'll get eviscerated again. If Tebow plays like he did last week and the Denver defense can tee off on Brady, Denver wins. But I don't think both of those things happen. Patriots roll, but it won't be as lopsided as their last meeting.
Sunday at 1:00pm ET -
Houston (3-seed) @ Baltimore (2-seed)
I expect our AFC Super Bowl representative to be this game's winner. This will be a nasty game, a black-and-blue game, with the two best running backs in the game leading their teams. Arian Foster and Ray Rice are absolute beasts. Both teams play marvelous defense. It's going to come down to which quarterback stays cool under pressure and can make the tough throw in the clutch. I think Houston's ability to spell Foster with Ben Tate is an advantage for them, but I think Baltimore gets a big advantage with playoff-tested Joe Flacco, as opposed to T.J. Yates. Houston could pull this off. But I think they're a young team, new to the playoffs, going up against an experienced team on their turf. Veteran savvy of guys like Ray Lewis and Terrell Suggs will lead the defense; the poise of Joe Flacco will be the difference between the two teams on offense. Baltimore will win a close, hard-fought game.
Sunday at 4:30pm ET -
NY Giants (4-seed) @ Green Bay (1-seed)
The Giants have suddenly played three remarkable games in a row. In the regular season, we're bracing for the inevitable "how'd they lose that one" game. In the playoffs, well, 2007 taught us anything is possible. The Giants defense is meshing at the right time; they crushed Atlanta. The defensive line might be the best in the playoffs right now. If Kansas City can beat Green Bay, anyone can, and the G-Men are no strangers to playing in the cold. It's a lot like the Denver/New England game - if they can get pressure on Rodgers and Eli doesn't make mistakes, they win. And Rodgers hasn't played in three weeks, since McCarthy gave him Week 17 off. I've seen teams struggle after resting starters on Week 17, but I don't think that happens to Green Bay. Rodgers has been playing out of his mind and for them to lose their first playoff game this season would be a resounding disappointment. I think the Giants have a great chance at an upset here, but I don't see it happening.
You may notice as you look at this week's slate of games that last week, all four Wild Card teams were eliminated. Home teams went 4-0 last week. Will it happen again? History says the divisional round is the most lopsided in favor of the home team (check the stats, really).
Saturday at 4:30pm ET -
New Orleans (3-seed) @ San Francisco (2-seed)
I feel like New Orleans is the team to beat right now in the NFC. Say what you want about the Packers, but is any team playing offense as well as the Saints? The Packers might be the most dynamic offense, but the Saints are becoming the most efficient. Shut down the run and they'll smoke you through the air. Take away their deep routes and they'll gash you short and with the run. They look indomitable. But the common maxim has always been that defense wins championships. That theory is put to the test in this game - the better offense or the better defense? I'm taking the Saints' offense, and a defense that's just good enough.
Saturday at 8:00pm ET -
Denver (4-seed) @ New England (1-seed)
Tim vs. Tom. Denver's win last week was improbable and came against a battered Pittsburgh defense - make no mistake; Ike Taylor is not a great CB and the Steelers were playing all backups on their D-line. However, Pittsburgh's second-string defense is probably better than New England's first-string. But the Patriots offense, if it gets going, can shred Denver's defense. The onus of this game really falls on Denver's defense: can they make Brady uncomfortable and knock him off his rhythm? If yes, they have a chance. If not, then they'll get eviscerated again. If Tebow plays like he did last week and the Denver defense can tee off on Brady, Denver wins. But I don't think both of those things happen. Patriots roll, but it won't be as lopsided as their last meeting.
Sunday at 1:00pm ET -
Houston (3-seed) @ Baltimore (2-seed)
I expect our AFC Super Bowl representative to be this game's winner. This will be a nasty game, a black-and-blue game, with the two best running backs in the game leading their teams. Arian Foster and Ray Rice are absolute beasts. Both teams play marvelous defense. It's going to come down to which quarterback stays cool under pressure and can make the tough throw in the clutch. I think Houston's ability to spell Foster with Ben Tate is an advantage for them, but I think Baltimore gets a big advantage with playoff-tested Joe Flacco, as opposed to T.J. Yates. Houston could pull this off. But I think they're a young team, new to the playoffs, going up against an experienced team on their turf. Veteran savvy of guys like Ray Lewis and Terrell Suggs will lead the defense; the poise of Joe Flacco will be the difference between the two teams on offense. Baltimore will win a close, hard-fought game.
Sunday at 4:30pm ET -
NY Giants (4-seed) @ Green Bay (1-seed)
The Giants have suddenly played three remarkable games in a row. In the regular season, we're bracing for the inevitable "how'd they lose that one" game. In the playoffs, well, 2007 taught us anything is possible. The Giants defense is meshing at the right time; they crushed Atlanta. The defensive line might be the best in the playoffs right now. If Kansas City can beat Green Bay, anyone can, and the G-Men are no strangers to playing in the cold. It's a lot like the Denver/New England game - if they can get pressure on Rodgers and Eli doesn't make mistakes, they win. And Rodgers hasn't played in three weeks, since McCarthy gave him Week 17 off. I've seen teams struggle after resting starters on Week 17, but I don't think that happens to Green Bay. Rodgers has been playing out of his mind and for them to lose their first playoff game this season would be a resounding disappointment. I think the Giants have a great chance at an upset here, but I don't see it happening.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Pierce's Picks - NFL Wild Card Weekend
After a 159-97 season record for me, it's time to look ahead to the matchups this weekend and see how the NFL playoffs will unfold. I'll give more talk per game in the playoffs than I do during the season.
Saturday at 4:30pm ET -
Cincinnati (6-seed) @ Houston (3-seed)
Both teams stumbled into the playoffs, so neither really has a lot of momentum going on. Houston might start Jake Delhomme at QB if T.J. Yates can't go, but word lately is that Yates will be fine. Still, their options are either the late-round rookie who looked unflappable at first but then began to wilt slightly, or a guy whose last playoff performance was an epic disaster. Arian Foster and Ben Tate will have to step up, along with Houston's defense, to win here. For Cincinnati, they can't underestimate this game. In fact, it should play a lot like a game against Pittsburgh or Baltimore for them - tough defense and a lot of running the ball. The problem? They went 0-4 against Pittsburgh and Baltimore. They lost to Houston, as well, surrendering a last-second TD. While I think losing to a team and then playing them again later can offer some benefits insofar as game-planning goes, I don't think Cincinnati has the weapons, the experience, or the hunger yet to keep up with the Texans or anyone else in the AFC playoff field. They'll be a better, more-prepared team next year, but they're not going anywhere else this year.
Saturday at 8:00pm ET -
Detroit (6-seed) @ New Orleans (3-seed)
Make no mistake - this is the game of the weekend. Two 5,000-yard passers facing off for the first time in NFL history, leading two dynamic (yet very different) offenses. The Lions played the Saints after Thanksgiving and lost 31-17, something the sports pundits are going on about. The Saints are also playing their best football of the season right now. I don't think either team is overlooking each other. The Lions kept it close in December until penalties derailed them; and that was with their best safety, cornerback and running back out. Those men - Louis Delmas, Chris Houston, and Kevin Smith - are all ready for this game. If the Lions can play solid, mistake-free ball and not make dumb penalties at dumb times, this is a winnable game for them. For the Saints, they need to blitz Stafford and get him off his rhythm - his numbers with a pass-rush of 5+ are lower than standard, but you have to think the Lions prepared for that this week. Still, the Saints blitz better than anyone right now. Otherwise, the Saints just need to roll on as they have been lately. Still, something about this game screams trap to me - everything seems to favor the Saints and in a playoff atmosphere, with so much on the line, against a team that's young and hungry and playing with a chip on its shoulder, you just never know what can happen. My football brain says Saints, but my gut says Lions and my heart bleeds Honolulu Blue & Silver - so I think the Lions bring it this week and stun the Saints at home.
Sunday at 1:00pm ET -
Atlanta (5-seed) @ NY Giants (4-seed)
This is a tough matchup to pick. The Giants tend to play a horrible game after playing one or two great ones; I'm waiting for that pattern to kick in. Atlanta does the same, losing inexplicably at times. Both QBs are good, but not great; both can have elite games and both can be mistake-prone. Both teams have run-games that get the job done, but aren't as explosive as you might want. Both teams feature solid defenses. Earlier in the week, I thought about picking Atlanta, but really, the Falcons haven't shown me anything lately. The Giants, however, are rolling. It's not always pretty, but they get it done. Beyond that, I think the Giants have the key to this game - their pass-rush. It's the one particular area that I think these teams are strikingly different and I think it makes the big difference, especially when coupled with the fact that Matt Ryan's record is much better indoors than it is outside. Eli's experience and familiarity playing outside trumps Ryan's. Giants advance.
Sunday at 4:30pm ET -
Pittsburgh (5-seed) @ Denver (4-seed)
Where to begin? What to say? The Tim Tebow delusion has come crashing to reality over the last two weeks - against Buffalo and Kansas City. I doubt the gritty Steelers defense will be any more merciful to the young QB. This is the most lop-sided, most obvious matchup of the playoffs to me. Denver has a couple advantages - Big Ben's lack of health in his foot and that they're at home, playing at Mile High, which is often something opponents have to adapt to due to the thinner air (Ryan Clark will be inactive for the game, for example, due to his asthma combined with the thin air). I don't expect the Tim Tebow Option offense to work against Pittsburgh. This is a savvy, nasty, veteran defense. There's enough tape out there of Tebow now that teams are figuring him out and truly exposing him. While Denver's defense has been very good this season, they won't be able to hold the Steelers low enough to keep it close, especially if Tebow offers up a number of turnovers as he has lately. The talent gap and experience gap between these two teams is gigantic and based on recent play, I find it impossible to think that a team that lost its last 3, yet won its division with an 8-8 record, goes anywhere in the playoffs.
--
Yes, I know. I talk about talent gap and experience gap and use that as a factor to count out Cincinnati and Denver, yet not Detroit. Fair enough, calling me out on that. But look closely. I think the talent gap between Detroit and New Orleans is smaller than people observe. The primary difference between them is that Detroit's running game isn't there. Otherwise, they're relatively comparable across the board. Statistically, the Saints are a weaker pass defense than the Lions, but a better run defense. Both are top-5 passing teams, but the Saints run the ball effectively. Both utilize the tight-end position well and are fine using short dump-offs to the tight end or screens to the running back as a supplemental running game. The difference on defense is that the Saints blitz more, whereas the Lions typically stick to the 4-man rush, due to their ability to rotate out D-linemen throughout the game. That's the other key - the Lions need to generate pressure with their 4-man rush (didn't happen in the loss) or get sliced apart; they also need to pickup the Saints' blitz, or Stafford needs to be making some good pre-snap reads to identify single-coverage and get the ball out fast. If the Lions are prepared, the Saints' blitzing ways could hurt them.
The Saints are Super Bowl winners. They have experience. The Lions only have six players who have played in a playoff game. Why isn't that a big deal to me? Well, we'll see. The way it'll manifest negatively is if the Lions lose their cool like they did against Green Bay and New Orleans earlier this season. Schwartz has re-emphasized discipline since then and the best example of it came in the 38-10 decimation of San Diego - a game in which the Lions committed 3 penalties for 8 yards, with all 3 coming at inconsequential moments. If they can do that against the Saints, the game will stay close - it only got out of hand in December due to horrendous post-whistle personal fouls and other such chippy behavior. I think they remember that game. I think it's fuel now. That loss, on national TV, hurt and showed a Lions team that wasn't ready for the spotlight. You can't tell me that isn't on their mind now, waiting for Saturday night to roll around, thinking, "We'll show 'em we're ready now." I think they are.
Saturday at 4:30pm ET -
Cincinnati (6-seed) @ Houston (3-seed)
Both teams stumbled into the playoffs, so neither really has a lot of momentum going on. Houston might start Jake Delhomme at QB if T.J. Yates can't go, but word lately is that Yates will be fine. Still, their options are either the late-round rookie who looked unflappable at first but then began to wilt slightly, or a guy whose last playoff performance was an epic disaster. Arian Foster and Ben Tate will have to step up, along with Houston's defense, to win here. For Cincinnati, they can't underestimate this game. In fact, it should play a lot like a game against Pittsburgh or Baltimore for them - tough defense and a lot of running the ball. The problem? They went 0-4 against Pittsburgh and Baltimore. They lost to Houston, as well, surrendering a last-second TD. While I think losing to a team and then playing them again later can offer some benefits insofar as game-planning goes, I don't think Cincinnati has the weapons, the experience, or the hunger yet to keep up with the Texans or anyone else in the AFC playoff field. They'll be a better, more-prepared team next year, but they're not going anywhere else this year.
Saturday at 8:00pm ET -
Detroit (6-seed) @ New Orleans (3-seed)
Make no mistake - this is the game of the weekend. Two 5,000-yard passers facing off for the first time in NFL history, leading two dynamic (yet very different) offenses. The Lions played the Saints after Thanksgiving and lost 31-17, something the sports pundits are going on about. The Saints are also playing their best football of the season right now. I don't think either team is overlooking each other. The Lions kept it close in December until penalties derailed them; and that was with their best safety, cornerback and running back out. Those men - Louis Delmas, Chris Houston, and Kevin Smith - are all ready for this game. If the Lions can play solid, mistake-free ball and not make dumb penalties at dumb times, this is a winnable game for them. For the Saints, they need to blitz Stafford and get him off his rhythm - his numbers with a pass-rush of 5+ are lower than standard, but you have to think the Lions prepared for that this week. Still, the Saints blitz better than anyone right now. Otherwise, the Saints just need to roll on as they have been lately. Still, something about this game screams trap to me - everything seems to favor the Saints and in a playoff atmosphere, with so much on the line, against a team that's young and hungry and playing with a chip on its shoulder, you just never know what can happen. My football brain says Saints, but my gut says Lions and my heart bleeds Honolulu Blue & Silver - so I think the Lions bring it this week and stun the Saints at home.
Sunday at 1:00pm ET -
Atlanta (5-seed) @ NY Giants (4-seed)
This is a tough matchup to pick. The Giants tend to play a horrible game after playing one or two great ones; I'm waiting for that pattern to kick in. Atlanta does the same, losing inexplicably at times. Both QBs are good, but not great; both can have elite games and both can be mistake-prone. Both teams have run-games that get the job done, but aren't as explosive as you might want. Both teams feature solid defenses. Earlier in the week, I thought about picking Atlanta, but really, the Falcons haven't shown me anything lately. The Giants, however, are rolling. It's not always pretty, but they get it done. Beyond that, I think the Giants have the key to this game - their pass-rush. It's the one particular area that I think these teams are strikingly different and I think it makes the big difference, especially when coupled with the fact that Matt Ryan's record is much better indoors than it is outside. Eli's experience and familiarity playing outside trumps Ryan's. Giants advance.
Sunday at 4:30pm ET -
Pittsburgh (5-seed) @ Denver (4-seed)
Where to begin? What to say? The Tim Tebow delusion has come crashing to reality over the last two weeks - against Buffalo and Kansas City. I doubt the gritty Steelers defense will be any more merciful to the young QB. This is the most lop-sided, most obvious matchup of the playoffs to me. Denver has a couple advantages - Big Ben's lack of health in his foot and that they're at home, playing at Mile High, which is often something opponents have to adapt to due to the thinner air (Ryan Clark will be inactive for the game, for example, due to his asthma combined with the thin air). I don't expect the Tim Tebow Option offense to work against Pittsburgh. This is a savvy, nasty, veteran defense. There's enough tape out there of Tebow now that teams are figuring him out and truly exposing him. While Denver's defense has been very good this season, they won't be able to hold the Steelers low enough to keep it close, especially if Tebow offers up a number of turnovers as he has lately. The talent gap and experience gap between these two teams is gigantic and based on recent play, I find it impossible to think that a team that lost its last 3, yet won its division with an 8-8 record, goes anywhere in the playoffs.
--
Yes, I know. I talk about talent gap and experience gap and use that as a factor to count out Cincinnati and Denver, yet not Detroit. Fair enough, calling me out on that. But look closely. I think the talent gap between Detroit and New Orleans is smaller than people observe. The primary difference between them is that Detroit's running game isn't there. Otherwise, they're relatively comparable across the board. Statistically, the Saints are a weaker pass defense than the Lions, but a better run defense. Both are top-5 passing teams, but the Saints run the ball effectively. Both utilize the tight-end position well and are fine using short dump-offs to the tight end or screens to the running back as a supplemental running game. The difference on defense is that the Saints blitz more, whereas the Lions typically stick to the 4-man rush, due to their ability to rotate out D-linemen throughout the game. That's the other key - the Lions need to generate pressure with their 4-man rush (didn't happen in the loss) or get sliced apart; they also need to pickup the Saints' blitz, or Stafford needs to be making some good pre-snap reads to identify single-coverage and get the ball out fast. If the Lions are prepared, the Saints' blitzing ways could hurt them.
The Saints are Super Bowl winners. They have experience. The Lions only have six players who have played in a playoff game. Why isn't that a big deal to me? Well, we'll see. The way it'll manifest negatively is if the Lions lose their cool like they did against Green Bay and New Orleans earlier this season. Schwartz has re-emphasized discipline since then and the best example of it came in the 38-10 decimation of San Diego - a game in which the Lions committed 3 penalties for 8 yards, with all 3 coming at inconsequential moments. If they can do that against the Saints, the game will stay close - it only got out of hand in December due to horrendous post-whistle personal fouls and other such chippy behavior. I think they remember that game. I think it's fuel now. That loss, on national TV, hurt and showed a Lions team that wasn't ready for the spotlight. You can't tell me that isn't on their mind now, waiting for Saturday night to roll around, thinking, "We'll show 'em we're ready now." I think they are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)